top of page

Knife Ban Lies EXPOSED: Government Gaslights Public with Fake Solutions While Knife Crime Soars—The Truth They Don’t Want You to Know!

  • Writer: Bénédict Tarot Freeman
    Bénédict Tarot Freeman
  • Jan 27
  • 6 min read

Hi and welcome to this Video Production News Speculative Presentation on the reality of knife sales bans.



At Video Production News, we believe in holding power to account and exposing the truth behind the policies and narratives being sold to the public.


In the wake of the recent tragedies involving Axel Rudakubana and Hassan Sentamu, there has been renewed political and media momentum toward further restricting the sale of knives in the UK. Once again, we see the government, along with some anti-knife crime charities, presenting what is, in reality, a completely unworkable solution to a deeply complex issue.


The idea of banning certain types of knives may seem like a straightforward and effective measure, but it is not. It is a hollow, performative response that distracts from the true causes of knife crime and the meaningful solutions that could actually reduce its prevalence. Worse still, it risks gaslighting the public into believing that this simplistic and fundamentally flawed approach will keep our streets safer.


To ensure the government and those driving this narrative cannot escape scrutiny, we are publishing this speculative presentation-a speech that should be delivered to Parliament and publicly debated.


In it, we lay out an evidence-based, watertight argument explaining why banning knife sales won’t work and why this approach is an outright distraction from what needs to be done. This is our way of going on the record, arming the public with the facts, and forcing those in power to answer the uncomfortable questions they are desperately avoiding.


This is not just about presenting a critique; it’s about ensuring that those responsible for driving policy are held accountable and that the public is not misled into supporting ineffective measures. Our streets deserve real solutions, not political theatrics. Let’s get to the truth:



Presentation to the UK Commons Select Committee on Knife Crime:


In light of the two recent high-profile stabbing cases of Axel Rudakubana and Hassan Sentamu, there have been increased calls to further restrict or ban the sale of certain types of knives in the UK. In this presentation, I will prove, through irrefutable evidence and logic, that such measures will have no tangible effect on reducing knife crime.


Instead, these proposals represent a waste of taxpayer money and a distraction from the real, effective solutions needed to address this epidemic. The reality is this: we cannot ban our way out of knife crime. Enforcement—not prohibition—is the only viable path forward. This is the difficult but essential conversation we must now have, rather than entertaining futile and performative bans that provide no real results.


1. The Impossible Task of Defining a “Banned Knife”


Let us first address the logistical absurdity of further banning certain types of knives. The tools used in the attacks by both Rudakubana and Sentamu were ordinary kitchen knives—knives that are present in virtually every household in the country. These are not specialty items, not weapons designed for combat, but everyday tools used to carve a roast, chop vegetables, or prepare meals.


The idea of banning kitchen knives is, quite obviously, a non-starter. But even if we limit the discussion to so-called “offensive weapons,” defining which knives to ban becomes a legal and logistical minefield. Consider the length argument: many seized machetes, often associated with gang violence, are no longer in length than a standard butcher’s scimitar knife. Should we ban these essential tools for chefs and butchers?


Similarly, if we ban swords as a catch-all solution, we penalize legitimate sword dealers, collectors, military re-enactors, and participants in sports like fencing. These individuals use these items responsibly and lawfully. The unintended consequences of such blanket restrictions make these proposals unworkable and disproportionate.


2. The Ineffectiveness of Knife Sale Bans in Reducing Crime


Evidence already shows that knife crime cannot be curbed by banning the sale of particular knives. Recent statistics reveal that 90% of knife crimes in the UK are committed with items that are already legally purchasable, such as kitchen knives, screwdrivers, or chisels. This means that the overwhelming majority of offenders are using tools readily available in any home or hardware store.


For those who commit crimes with banned knives, there is no reason to believe their behavior would change if those items were inaccessible—they would simply switch to alternatives. Criminals are, by definition, resourceful. If a carving knife is unavailable, a screwdriver will suffice. If a machete is banned, a sharpened chisel can take its place. This substitution effect renders sales bans irrelevant to the real issue.


The cases of Rudakubana and Sentamu demonstrate this perfectly. Both individuals used knives that were readily available and would not be covered by any proposed ban. Thus, the crimes that reignited this debate would not have been prevented by these measures.


3. Existing Laws Are Sufficient—If Properly Enforced


We must also remember that the carrying of virtually any knife in public without a legitimate reason is already illegal under UK law. For example, Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 prohibits carrying knives in public places without good reason, and the Offensive Weapons Act 2019 already addresses many of the so-called loopholes.


If the carrying of knives is already illegal, the question must be asked: why are these laws not being better enforced? Instead of chasing after performative bans, we should focus on utilizing predictive crime software, targeted stop-and-search operations, and equipping officers with knife-detecting wands. These measures have a proven track record of success and directly address the issue at its source: the act of carrying knives with intent to harm.


4. The Elephant in the Room: Lack of Consequences


Another fundamental issue is the lack of consequences for offenders caught carrying knives illegally. The UK already operates a “two strikes and you’re out” policy for knife crime, yet many offenders are caught three, four, or even five times without facing prison sentences. Why? Because our prison system is at capacity, leaving no room to house these offenders.


This lack of deterrence sends a dangerous message: that carrying a knife is a low-risk offense. Without consequences, there is no incentive for offenders to change their behavior. Expanding prison capacity to ensure meaningful consequences for illegal knife possession would do far more to reduce crime than banning the sale of knives.


5. Political Motivations and Gaslighting the Public


So, why are these bans being proposed despite their evident ineffectiveness? The answer is troubling: such proposals are politically expedient. They create the illusion of action without addressing the root causes of knife crime, such as enforcement failures, resource shortages, and social deprivation.


By focusing on banning knife sales, politicians deflect attention from the systemic issues that require long-term investment and reform. It is far easier to propose a headline-grabbing ban than to admit to failures in enforcement or to allocate funding for more police officers, better technology, and expanded prison capacity.


Conclusion: A Call for Real Solutions


In conclusion, the evidence is clear: banning the sale of certain knives will not reduce knife crime. Criminals will adapt, using whatever tools are available to them. The real solution lies in better enforcement of existing laws, targeted policing, and ensuring meaningful consequences for offenders.


We owe it to the victims of knife crime—and to the public—to pursue solutions that actually work. Anything less is not only a disservice to those affected but a dangerous distraction from the urgent need to address this crisis at its core. Thank you.



So, as we have demonstrated here , the idea of banning certain knives as a solution to the knife crime epidemic is not only impractical but a deliberate distraction from the real issues at hand.


Without proper enforcement of existing laws, investment in resources for targeted policing, and addressing the root causes of violent crime, no amount of legislation banning knife sales will reduce knife crime or make our streets safer.


We urge our readers to question the narratives being sold to them and demand accountability from those in power. The safety of our communities depends on real, actionable solutions and not on misguided policies designed to mislead and pacify the public.


Well, that's all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all, stay safe, and l'll see you then.


Bénédict Tarot Freeman

Editor-at-Large

VPN City-Desk


 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page