‘Grindr Gang’ Jailed For Nearly 80 Years Following Harrowing Violent Robbery Campaign

Hi and welcome to this JK B'HAM Crime Report for VPN: REGIONAL NETWORKS:

Five men have been sentenced to nearly 80 years in prison for a series of brutal robberies that targeted vulnerable victims across Birmingham and Derby, leaving a trail of violence and fear.

Over ten months in 2023 and 2024 the men lured victims into ambushes where they were violently assaulted, robbed, and left stranded.

Many attacks used the dating app Grindr to lure victims to late-night meetings in parks where the group lay in wait. Victims were often held captive for hours, threatened with weapons, and forced to transfer money from their accounts while enduring beatings with injuries including broken bones.

One particularly shocking incident in Derby saw two Good Samaritans brutally attacked when they stopped to help what they believed was a broken-down vehicle.

The gang also stole vehicles, house keys, and identification documents, leaving victims stranded and terrified.

Police Investigation

Detective Inspector Tom Lyons, who led the investigation, praised the meticulous work of officers who pieced together evidence through hours of CCTV footage, forensic phone analysis, and financial tracing.

“This was a calculated series of robberies with Hadza, Alezawy, Hassan, Omar, and Sharif deliberately targeting victims they perceived as vulnerable,” said DI Lyons. “I commend the victims for their courage in coming forward, which allowed us to build a strong case and bring these dangerous individuals to justice.”

Convictions and Sentences

On Monday, 13th Jan, Birmingham Crown Court handed lengthy sentences to the five men:

• Demalji Hadza (21): 16 years and two months

• Abubaker Alezawy (21): 16 years and five months

• Ali Hassan (20): 16 years and nine months

• Wasim Omar (24): 17 years and three months

• Mohammed Sharif (22): 12 years and three months

Hadza and Alezawy pleaded guilty early in their trial, while Hassan, Omar, and Sharif were convicted after a six-week trial in September 2024.

Detective Constable Sarah Byrne also highlighted the victims’ bravery: “Their evidence was crucial in holding these individuals accountable. I hope today’s sentencing brings them closure and reassures others that such crimes will be taken seriously.”

ACCESS TO THE LAW: Understanding the Crime and Sentencing

As part of our campaign to improve citizens’ access and understanding of UK Criminal law, we will be explaining the relevant UK legislation surrounding any case law relevant to our articles:

Understanding Robbery and Sentencing in England and Wales

The offence of robbery is defined under Section 8 of the Theft Act 1968 as theft involving the use or threat of force, either at the time of the theft or immediately before or after it, to facilitate the crime. Robbery is an indictable-only offence, meaning it is dealt with in the Crown Court due to its seriousness, and it carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

How Sentences Are Determined

Courts follow the Sentencing Council’s guidelines, which classify robbery offences based on two factors: the level of harm caused to the victim and the offender’s level of culpability. Several considerations influence the sentence:

• Aggravating factors include the use of weapons, violence, premeditation, targeting of vulnerable victims, or acting as part of a group.

• Mitigating factors include genuine remorse, an early guilty plea, or a lesser role in the offence.

Judges are required to ensure that sentences are proportionate to the harm caused and the offender’s intent. Sentencing is further guided by case law and statutory principles, including Section 152(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, which requires custodial sentences for offences of this severity.

Application in This Case

In this case, the robbery campaign involved premeditated and coordinated violence, targeting individuals perceived as vulnerable. The use of weapons and the lasting physical and psychological harm to victims meant that the court imposed significant custodial sentences. These sentences reflect not only the gravity of the offences but also the need to deter others and protect the public.

Well, that’s all for now. But until our next article, please stay tuned, stay informed, but most of all stay safe, and I’ll see you then.

Jason King

Birmingham City-Desk

Twitter (X) @JasonKingNews

Jasonkingnews@gmail.com